GENDER MARKERS IN A DIDACTICALLY ORIENTED SPEECH ACT IN ENGLISH

  • The authors:
    Elena V. Yakovleva, Ruben V. Agadzhanyan
  • Issue:November 16th, 2018
  • Pages: 298-309
  • Section: Cross-cultural component of the linguistic personality in understanding the socio-cultural reality
  • URL: http://conferences-ifl.rudn.ru/298-309/
  • DOI:10.22363/09129-2018-298-309

Abstract: The article focuses on the manifestation of the phenomenon of gender and its markers as found in didactically oriented speech acts. The findings discussed reflect a sample study of modern International Certificate materials in English with reference to gender characteristics as revealed therein.

Keywords: Gender markers, didactic speech acts, effectiveness, male discourse, female discourse

Elena V. Yakovleva
Institute of Foreign Languages Russian University of Peoples’ Friendship, Moscow, Russia
e-mail: elexs@mail.ru


Ruben V. Agadzhanyan
State-funded budget educational institution of Moscow city School No.166, Moscow, Russia
e-mail: ce3ar2006@yandex.ru

  • Bartning, I. 2000. Gender agreement in L2 French: Pre-advanced vs. advanced learners. Studia Linguistica, 54: 225–237.
  • Bocharova, E. 2013. Political discourse as a mean of conscious manipulation: on the materials of presidential election campaigns in Russia and the USA 2007-2008. PhD in Philology autoabstract, The National Research University, Belgorod, 22 p.
  • Bruhn de Garavito, J., & White, L.2000. L2 acquisition of Spanish DPs: The status of grammatical features. In: S. C. Howell, S. A. Fish, & T. Keith-Lucas (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development.Somerville, MA, Cascadila, pp. 164–175.
  • Dewaele, J.-M., & Véronique, D. 2001. Gender assignment and gender agreement in advanced French interlanguage: A cross-sectional study. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4: 275–297.
  • Foucart, A., & Frenck-Mestre, C. 2011. Grammatical gender processing in L2: Electrophysiological evidence of the effect of L1–L2 syntactic similarity. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14(3): 379–399.
  • Franceschina, F. 2005. Fossilized second language grammars: The acquisition of grammatical gender. J. Benjamins, Amsterdam,288 pp.
  • Ganushchak, L. Y., Verdonschot, R. G., & Schiller, N. O. 2011. When leaf becomes neuter: event-related potential evidence for grammatical gender transfer in bilingualism. Neuroreport,22: 106-110.
  • Gronskaya, N. (2003). Language mechanisms of mass political consciousness manipulation. Bulletin: N. I. Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod, 1: 220-231.
  • Hawkins, R., & Chan, C. Y. H. 1997. The partial availability of Universal Grammar in second language acquisition: The “failed functional features hypothesis.” Second Language Research, 13: 187–226.
  • Herschensohn, J. 2009. Processing of grammatical gender in French as a first and second language: Evidence from ERPs. EUROSLA Yearbook, 9(1): 76–106.
  • Hopp, H. 2013. Grammatical gender in adult L2 acquisition: Relations between lexical and syntactic variability, Second Language Research, 29(1): 33–56.
  • Kucherenko, K. 2013. Speech manipulation impact in political communication. PhD in Linguistics, Military University of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, Moscow, 179 pp.
  • Ladegaard, H.J. 2011. ‘Doing power’ at work: Responding to male and female management styles in a global business corporation. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(1): 4-19.
  • Lakoff, R. 1973. Language and Woman’s Place. Language in Society, 2(1): 45-80.
  • McDowell L. 2015. Class, Gender, and Space: Scale and the Production of Difference and Inequality. In: Anderson B., Hughes V. (eds) Citizenship and its Others. Migration, Diasporas and Citizenship Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. URL:http://www.bookmetrix.com/detail/chapter/0ee4cdcf-e1f9-4d28-b41f-adbe0f248c1a#downloads. [Accessed Oct. 22 2018]
  • Sabourin, L. 2003. Grammatical gender and second language processing: An ERP study. (Doctoral dissertation in Linguistics), University of Groningen, The Netherlands, Grodil, 185 pp.
  • Sabourin, L., Stowe, L., & de Hann, G. 2006. Transfer effects in learning a second language grammatical gender system. Second Language Research, 22: 1–29.
  • Sabourin, L., & Stowe, L. A. 2008. Second language processing: When are first and second languages processed similarly? Second Language Research, 24(3): 397–430.
  • Skoroletova, N. 2010. Gender differences of language behavior. Integrational processes in communicative space of regions: materials of International Scientific Conference, Volgograd, 12-14 April. URL: http://new.volsu.ru/download.php?id=00000026213-1. [Accessed Oct.4 2018]
  • TOEFL®CliffsTestPrep™CBT. 2015. Published by IDG Books Worldwide, Inc. An International Data Group Company 919 E. Hillsdale Blvd. Suite 400 Foster City, CA 94404, 80 pp.
  • Tokowicz, N., & MacWhinney, B. 2005. Implicit and explicit measures of sensitivity to violations in second language grammar: An event-related potential investigation. Studies in Second Language. Acquisition, 27: 173–204.
  • TOEFL Clifffs Tests. 2015. URL: https://magoosh.com/toefl/2015/toefl-reading-sample-pdf/. [Accessed Oct. 16 2018]