Abstract: Globalization as a phenomenon can already be considered as an accomplished fact. Blurring of state, national, cultural and other orders takes place in full view of everyone that gives rise to a new reality, towhich various institutions and social group of all ages have to adapt. The modern universities don’t stand aside of this process. They pretend to have a global status ant create a highly competitive market for educational services. They act as “factories for the production of knowledge” and aggregate intellectual resources from various countries. Universities create a special multicultural environment in which, on
the one hand, a dialogue of cultures takes place, and on the other,
there is a unification of communication and language practices.
In this context, expected questions arise about the readiness of the
Russian educational system to compete with the dominant AngloSaxon model. In our opinion, this set of issues is still open.
In this regard, the purpose of this study is to assess the potential
for the development of intercultural communication in the leading Russian universities with a subsequent increase of interna tionalization indicators. The subject of study is the student audience as a part of communication and an owner of a number of
demographic, psychographic and behavioral characteristics.
In view of this, in December 2016, there was conducted the survey of 170 Bachelor’s and Master’s degree students of the direction “Advertising and Public Relations” in the Institute of World
Economy and Business of the Peoples’ Friendship University of
Russia (IWEB RUDN University). They were asked to answer
anonymously the questions of the survey, which contained several meaningful modules, including describing formal demographic and behavioral characteristics.
After the information processing of the survey’s result we noted
the key takeaways that allow us to conclude that the part of the
Russian students among the respondents demonstrates a high
level of opportunities, but a low level of interest in developing
their intercultural communication skills.
Keywords: intercultural communication, global university, survey, student community

Anna V. Glagoleva1 , Evgeniya A. Kuznetsova 2 , Yulia N. Zemskaya3
1, 2, 3
Faculty of Economics
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia
Moscow, Russia

Bennett, A., 2010. Defining the global university. USC News. [Accessed October 18, 2019].
Bibler, V.S., 1991. From the epistemology — to the logic of culture. Politizdat, Moscow, 417 pp.
Crystal, D., 2003. English as a global language. Cambridge University Press, New York, 212 pp.
Hall, E.T., 1989. Beyond Culture. Anchor Books, New York,
320 pp.
Pennycook, A., 2009. Global Englishes and transcultural flows.
Taylor & Francis e-Library, New York, 191 pp.
Popova, N.G., 2017. Communicative instruments of linguistic
imperialism: the IMRAD format, CLIL technologies and academic writing centres. In: Sharonova, S.A., Trubnikova, N.V.
(Eds.), Intellectual colonialism in the global education market,
PFUR, Moscow, Russia, pp. 115-143.
Sharonova, S.A., Trubnikova, N.V., Erokhova, N.S., Nazarova,
H.A., 2018. Intellectual colonialism and national education systems. XLinguae11 (2): 338-351
Suresh Canagarajah, A., 2003. Resisting linguistic imperialism in
English teaching. Oxford University Press, New York, 216 pp.
University 3.0 — center of science, education and technological
Entrepreneurship, 2016. Innovation portal NSU. [Accessed October 17,
Weijen, D., 2012. The language of (future) scientific communication. Research Trends issue-31-november-2012/the-language-of-future-scientificcommunication/. [Accessed October 15, 2019].
Wissema, J.G., 2016. Third Generation University. OlimpBusiness, Moscow, 480 pp.